Reliability and validity of the persian version of the General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI)
Authors
Abstract:
Introduction: As the oral health related quality of life has been important in many dental patients GOHAI is an acceptable tool, preparing its Persian version can be useful in oral health research among Persian populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Persian version of General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI). Methods: Translation was performed using the forward-backward process. The final Persian version was then tested through an interview and test-retest to evaluate its comprehensibility and reliability. A sample of 150 subjects (20-65 years old) was requested to answer the GOHAI items prior to a clinical examination. Data on the subjects’ socio-demographic characteristics and self-rating report of oral health, general health and dental care needs were recorded. Internal consistency was calculated by Cronbach’s α. Interview and test-retest reliability was evaluated by weighted kappa. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing GOHAI scores and self-rated measures of oral health, general health and perceived dental care needs. Discriminant validity was tested by comparing GOHAI scores with clinical oral condition. Results: The mean GOHAI score was 46.78±7.85. Cronbach’s α (0.78) showed a high internal consistency and homogeneity between items. Weighted kappa coefficient for the interview varied from 0.60 to 0.96 and was between 0.33 and 0.64 for test-retest. Bland-Altman plot displayed a good agreement between the two GOHAI scores for both the interview and test-retest. There was no significant relationship between GOHAI scores and self-rating oral health (p=0.090), but there was a relationship between self-rating general health and mean GOHAI scores (p=0.047). Also, the low GOHAI scores were associated with the perceived dental care needs (p=0.001). There was an opposite correlation between GOHAI scores and caries and missing teeth (p<0.0001). Conclusions: The Persian version of the GOHAI exhibits acceptable reliability and validity, so it can be used widely throughout the persian communities.
similar resources
Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP)-14
Background: The need for assessment of oral health related quality of life has been increased over the last decades. The aim of this study was to develop a Persian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-14 and to evaluate its reliability and validity for its use in Persian-speaking communities. Methods: The original version of the OHIP-14 was translated into the Persian language using...
full textThe Assessment of Reliability and Validity of Persian Version of the Endometriosis Health Profile (EHP-30)
Background: The Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) is a disease-specific questionnaire to measure the health-related quality of life in patients with endometriosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Persian version of Endometriosis Health Pro-file (EHP-30) in women with endometriosis referring to three Gynecology Clinics in Tehran, Iran. Met...
full textعنوان روایی پایایی نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه سرمایه اجتماعی اونیکس در سالمندان validity and reliability of the persian version of onyx social capital measurement
مقدمه: یکی از چالشهایی که اغلب سالمندان با آن مواجهند برقراری ارتباط با افراد جدید و بزرگتر کردن دایره روابط اجتماعی خود می باشد. برقراری روابط اجتماعی و ایجاد و تقویت شبکه اجتماعی در سالمندان ممکن است منجر به ایجاد سرمایه اجتماعی شود. سرمایه اجتماعی یک مسئله چند بعدی است که ابعاد مختلفی از ساختار اجتماعی را در بر می گیرد. در این پژوهش بر آن بوده ایم که به تهیه نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه سرمایه اجتماع...
Validity and reliability of the persian version of the chronic oral mucosal diseases questionnaire
Background: Chronic oral mucosal disease questionnaire (COMDQ) is used to evaluate the quality of life in patients with chronic conditions of the oral mucosa. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Persian version of this questionnaire. Methods: A total of 135 subjects were selected in two groups; group 1 consisted of 95 patients with chronic oral muco...
full textValidity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Dula Dangerous Driving Index
Introduction: Road traffic accidents (RTAs) have always a major concern and human factor has been recognized as their leading cause. Since taxi drivers play a significant role in accidents, the main purpose of this study was to provide a valid and reliable version of the Dula Dangerous Driving Index (3DI) for taxi drivers working in the city of Zanjan, Iran. Material and Methods: Based on the ...
full textValidity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI)
Introduction: The Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI) is one of the instruments used for measuring a dysphagic patient’s self-assessment. In some ways, it reflects the patient’s quality of life. Although it has been recognized and widely applied in English speaking populations, it has not been used in its present forms in Persian speaking countries. The purpose of this study was to adapt a Persian v...
full textMy Resources
Journal title
volume 2 issue None
pages 8- 17
publication date 2013-03
By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023